Auch wenn manche nicht den Bezug zu Steinhoff sehen wollen. Lasst euch gesagt sein, nicht jeder Prozess wird direkt von Steinhoff geführt. Auch die unzähligen Tochtergesellschaften können Prozesse für ihre Muttergeselschaft führen. In den beiden Artikeln die ich gestern gepostet habe, wurde die Steinhoff Group explizit erwähnt auch wenn sie in diesem Fall vielleicht nicht direkt zu den Klageparteien gehören. Also behauptet bitte nicht, dass es keinen Bezug zu Steinhoff gibt.
Im Annual Report 2017 auf Seite 259 steht etwas zur Formal Holdings:
Hachmer Beheer B.V. (Hachmer) was a subsidiary of Habufa until 29 December 2016, at which point the Group held a 50% interest in Habufa. Loan agreements indicate Hachmer granted a loan of up to £50 million to Mayfair Holdings Proprietary Limited (Mayfair) on 6 December 2016, whose ultimate shareholder was a family trust of Markus Jooste. A back-to-back loan agreement was entered into between Hachmer and Formal Holdings Limited (Formal) (a company affiliated with a business partner of Markus Jooste). The investment in Hachmer was sold to Holding van den Bosch
B.V. (the Group's joint venture partner in Habufa) in December 2016. Mayfair Speculators Proprietary Limited (Mayfair Speculators), a direct subsidiary of Mayfair, assumed the obligation owing to Hachmer on 10 November 2017. Management of Hachmer did not recognise the loans at the time the loans were expected to have been granted as no
cash flowed via Hachmer, despite the loan agreements concluded. Given that Hachmer was a related party of the Group at the time the loan was allegedly granted the transaction has been disclosed. As Hachmer was disposed by the Group,
the alleged loan is not included in any Group results.
www.steinhoffinternational.com/annual-reports-2017.php