von enis im ihub gefunden und wie ich finde sehr interessant, was wieder nen Brief bzgl HV ins Gespräch bringt. Gibts da was neues?
body1enis21: fsshon IHUB
2
08:44
#79089 downup
Ok I am going to put some
conjecture out there (quite long), so stay with me and we'll see if you
guys/gals are thinking like I am..
Here's the question.. What
if the Sealed Document that Susman team had in their possession proves
beyond a doubt that JPM has been using shadow companies to acquire the
common shares of WAMUQ and in return picking up more than enough shares
that substandardly violates the Court's order or gives them majority
ownership of shares? yes I know TPG supposedly has 50.4% ownership and
is quieter than a field mouse with a hawk overhead..
Now
think hard, what happened on March 12th (5 minutes before Rosen spoke)
that tanked all the stocks in unison. JPM and Weil knew of the
Settlement. Friedman met with Rosen in hallway 10 minutes before Rosen
spoke, who did she call after getting Rosen;s approval. EC publicly
said they did not have a clue of settlement..Who does Susman represent,
who is his client.. The EC right? Who is the EC? They are
representatives installed by the UST to represent the interest of
equity. Now what documents would Weil/Quinn be stupid enough to
willingly hand over to Susman as part of the meet and confer and the
"work product" agreement? Susman team may have been given just enough
shareholder ownership info that Weill had to obtain for the UST in Dec,
that proves JPM (through subs/hedgies/funds) orchestrated the take down
of WAMU shareholders on March 12th through the use of controlled hedge
funds and investment companies that have controlling interest over.
How can you prove this? You do it with the info that was released
by the debotors in Dec that was from the Transfer Agent. Exigent
circumstances that required a 2 hour chamber meeting, would be a
questioning of all attorneys if they are knowledgeable about JPM's
activites in share acquisition.
JPM attorney's at the last
omnibus were as quiet as a librarian. You see this does not jive with
their M.O. They have been fighting the Examiner tooth and nail and then
on the day to argue and make a case to the judge, they do not even
approach the podium. Stacey Friedman was not even there !!! Sacks was,
but not "loud mouth/unsrcupulous/conniving Friedman!" That to me is a
sign of what happened, something tells me JPM is in serious trouble.
Friedman may have had knowledge and will need to hide behind
"attorney-client priv" or she might have called the "trigger puller."
So who owns the majority shares of WAMUQ? Is it TPG? Is it a
Hedgie that JPM controls? Is it a Shadow Company or companies that JPM
controls? You see, Chase and JPM are the worst and most dishonest
managers and bankers in the business. They would sell their grandmother
to make a buck for Jamie and his BOD. What is going to keep them from
trying to steal the company by shareholder proxy vote? Install the Board members
they want and approve the GS in Dimon/Bair favor. Who was buying up the
shares at the bottom on march 12th? we couldn't get any until .13 and
on the preferreds, Good Luck !!
Look at what THJMW is
saying here.
Quote:With
respect to the issue of the shareholders' meeting, I will continue that
to September 7th as well. I think that I need more information as to
whether or not that should proceed on a dual track... or a triple track...
with the examiner and confirmation process. If I am convinced by the
examiner's report that the process should continue to confirmation
without a shareholder meeting I'll consider that strongly in my decision
on the Equity Committee request for that.
She already said "shareholders can have governance rights in BK"
Why is she now backing away from that? Maybe THJMW knows now that JPM is
going to win either way in the confirmation process and does not want
to allow shareholder meeting until the Examiner gets to the Transfer
Agent and runs down the share transactions.
This could very
well be the "smoking gun" she was referring to. Look anyone with half a
brain can see that shareholders got shafted on March 12th, the clues
need to lead to who it was that was doing the shafting.
I
have a feeling JPM is now in some serious BK fraud trouble and THJMW
wants the Examiner on a "double or for that matter a triple track!"
There is a COI (Conflict of Interest) here, I feel it. JPM using the BK
court for its own purposes/gain is not necessarily illegal, but if done
through Weil/Quinn etc.. It is a COI..Manipulating a Stock with insider
knowledge is very ILLEGAL!
Something tells me the Susman team
unearthed a document that holds holdings info. Examiner is on the way
to the TA's office ASAP. It should be in the Sept 7th report. If this
stock is compromised, Susman has a dilema on his hands. This is why we
want a Cusip/Name change on stock, so it will all be called in and TA
can get accurate and current info on ownership.
Ilenes I
think this is where we need to head to in the letter to THJMW. We have
to have accurate accounting of shares. We have to call in the stock.
My nose itches !!!
Don
<<< Posting gekürzt anzeigen
Möge der große Frosch mit Euch sein!